W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

HTML+RDFa Editorial Comment

From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:10:00 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOk_reHd=9ZRdMniqHwHmfUGGyAxfTuvY1NtcK+ndnzCaeVi2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Following on to an earlier mail today, I somehow missed this:

Documents served as application/xhtml+xml, that don't contain a DTD, and
> don't specify a @version attribute *must* be interpreted as XHTML5+RDFa
> 1.1 documents.

The document does not 'contain a DTD'.  It contains a DOCTYPE declaration
that references an XHTML+RDFa family DTD.  Or something along those lines.

Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 12:10:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC