W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: new draft for the RDFa Primer

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:45:34 +0100
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6E15EBBC-4144-4922-83DF-8B4542C4B914@w3.org>
To: shane@aptest.com
Ok, updated to the latest respec. It did take some time: the new respec adds some hitherto unused elements for figures (figurecaption, figure), meaning that my CSS had to be updated (which was the easy part, first I had to find out what respec does:-). But it seems to be o.k. now.

Is the etiquette still so that one can update the bibliography file on Robin's github account? Would that be automatically used by the tool at W3C, or should we do something else? I guess we will have to be careful about that when our documents are finalized...

Ivan

On Jan 31, 2013, at 04:22 , Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote:

> It is definitely worth upgrading - the bibliography is not maintained that well in the older ReSpec any longer.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:51 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > Guys,
> >
> > I have made some editing on the Primer, and a new draft is at
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-primer/Overview-src.html
> >
> > most of the changes were the various error reports coming in since the last publication. I have also added a new section (2.1.3) on the property copying stuff (and also a note in section 2.1.4 that tackles a similar problem but using @resource). Comments please...
> 
> There's a problem in the second example in 2.1.3: the link href's are to "#ccpattern", but the Pattern is defined with @resource="ccpattern"; you're probably confusing with the @id attribute. It should be changed to @resource="#ccpattern".
> 
> Otherwise, the section looks great, and flows well form the proceeding.
> 
> The RDF-SPARQL-QUERY reference should probably be updated to SPARQL-QUERY for SPARQL 1.1.
> 
> Interesting that there's no link to RDF-CONCEPTS; is this intentional? I suppose RDF-PRIMER does it.
> 
> > Also: Gregg or Manu: is it worth the trouble changing respec to the newest version? What does it entail for the document?
> 
> It's pretty straight-foward; it took me 10 minutes or so to update rdfa-in-html, but that was because some custom features needed to be ported over, which I've already done. I'd be happy to help you with it, if it's a problem. I think being on the latest version is a good idea.
> 
> Gregg
> 
> > Thanks
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> > ----
> > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > mobile: +31-641044153
> > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 11:46:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC