W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

[Bug 20719] Make the example more enlightening - explain more and perhaps add a second example

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:50:06 +0000
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20719-6123-C066KAIAxJ@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20719

Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Fixed. I added basic RDFa 1.1 markup to the first example along with
the expected output from an RDFa Processor.

You can view the changes here:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-in-html/Overview-src.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 26 January 2013 18:50:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC