Re: @lang and @datatype interaction

On 17 April 2013 22:30, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:

>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 17 April 2013 14:48, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> wrote:
> >> On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:13 AM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> Is it possible to add these test cases to the EARL tests?
> >> I would think we'd already have a similar test, but there may be
> something special about this particular form that's tickling the bug.
> >>
> >> Reece, you can check out the test suite source code at
> https://github.com/rdfa/rdfa-website, and if your test case isn't already
> covered, feel free to create a pull request.
> >>
> >>
> >> Done.
> >>
> >> I have found that RDF::RDFa passes with @property+@datatype but fails
> with @property+@datatype+@content when the parent element has an @lang
> specified.
> >
> > You can file issues on RDF:RDFa at
> http://github.com/ruby-rdf/rdf-rdfa/issues. But, I'll look at this later
> today. Generally, if multiple implementations do different things, it
> implies that there is a missing test. I'll look into this in more detail
> later today.
>
> FYI, the new test cases were merged and are now live in the RDFa test
> suite (thanks for that). Also, I've found and corrected the issue in
> RDF::RDFa, which is now released as version 1.0.2.
>

I have run the new RDF::RDFa on my RDFa content and it is producing the
correct data :). Thanks for updating it so quickly!

Thanks,
- Reece