- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 07:42:45 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Manu, - I should have said upfront: I think we have exactly the same situation with @value in the same section. Ie, I believe both should be allowed in RDFa+HTML5 Lite - We should call out explicitly to this fact in 3.1 - Because these are valid HTML5 attributes, I would expect this does not affect Mike's validator... Thanks! Ivan On Nov 8, 2012, at 23:01 , Manu Sporny wrote: > On 11/08/2012 01:58 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >>> Section 3.1 in the HTML5+RDFa calls out for the @datatime >>> attribute. Is this attribute allowed in RDFa Lite? >> >> Well, it's an HTML5 attribute, that is interpreted by RDFa 1.1, so I >> would definitely say that it is allowed. > > Yes, I think this is clear... @datetime is the same as @href and @src > wrt. how RDFa Lite 1.1 talks about it (in that it doesn't need to talk > about it because it's a part of the host language). > > I don't think we need an issue for it. If anybody disagrees, please > speak up. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 12:43:20 UTC