W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:50:10 +0100
To: RDF Web Applications Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Cc: sysbot+tracker@w3.org
Message-ID: <20120521125010.1e4714b6@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:45:00 +0000
RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> Option #1: ignore @rel if it only includes HTML Link types as defined
> at http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-author/links.html#linkTypes
> 
> Option #2: ignore @rel if it does not include any explicit CURIE.

Here's another option that I thought of this morning.

Option #3: RDFa processors honour @rel as usual, but RDFa documents are
non-conforming if rel is used with a non-CURIE, non-URI token within
the scope of @vocab. Conformance checkers MUST report this.

This way document authors get told about the potential ambiguity, and
are required to resolve it to achieve a conforming document, and RDFa
parsing is consistent between XHTML+RDFa and HTML+RDFa, which helps
people who want to author polyglot XHTML/HTML content.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 11:48:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 May 2012 11:48:56 GMT