W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: SVG test case with embedded RDF/XML

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:48:01 -0400
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B1246E7D-04B5-4BD7-A2FE-937771D64D75@greggkellogg.net>
On May 17, 2012, at 9:06 PM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> On 18 May 2012, at 04:50, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>> I updated my processor to handle embedded RDF/XML and to parse the content of script elements having an @type which matches a content-type of an available RDF parser (typically text/turtle, but why not application/ld+json?).
> Out of curiosity: is it a default behaviour in your processor or optional? At the moment my processor does that for turtle only if a special flag is turned on.

Default. Not much of a risk of emitting triples by accident.

>> I also added support for putting extracted triples in a named graph based on using any @id value of the script element as a fragid on the document location.
> There were some discussion about this usage of @id of  the script element on the RDF mailing list, but the results are inconclusive. There are issues in general reusing host language attributes in this way...

It was suggested in the reference Tony sent, which was really more about N3. Again, the odds of a script tag with both a matching @type and @id seems pretty negligible. Plus, the parser emits statements. A graph context is dropped if their added to a container that doesn't support contexts.


> Ivan
>> Gregg
>> On May 17, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>> Well, if we're open to having tests that span formats, was should consider parsing Turtle marked up using <script type="application/turtle"> within HTML, at least when the Turtle spec is more settled.
>>> I hadn't considered the embedded RDF/XML before, but it should be easy enough to add to my parser.
>>> Gregg Kellogg
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> On May 17, 2012, at 3:33 AM, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> <test-cases/0310> dc:contributor "Toby Inkster";
>>>> dc:title "Embedded chunks of RDF/XML";
>>>> a test:TestCase;
>>>> rdfatest:rdfaVersion "rdfa1.0", "rdfa1.1";
>>>> test:classification test:required;  # ?!
>>>> test:expectedResults "true"^^xsd:boolean;
>>>> rdfatest:hostLanguage "svgtiny1.2", "svg";
>>>> test:informationResourceInput <test-cases/0310.html>;
>>>> test:informationResourceResults <test-cases/0310.sparql>;
>>>> test:purpose "Tests that embedded RDF/XML is added to same graph.";
>>>> test:specificationReference
>>>>  "http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/metadata.html#Introduction
>>>>  says 'an RDF processor should combine them into the same graph'" .
>>>> -- 
>>>> Toby A Inkster
>>>> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
>>>> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>>>> <0310.sparql>
>>>> <0310.txt>
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 04:48:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:56 UTC