- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:22:09 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Exactly. No big deal, in fact. But... until this is a standard, it cannot be, normatively, added to the RDFa document. But an informal note is possible. Ivan --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) On 16 May 2012, at 18:42, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > Seems like the effect on processing rules would be parallel to XMLLiteral, but without the @xmlns or @lang/@xml:lang promotion. > > Gregg > > On May 16, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> See, eg, >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012May/0027.html >> >> although the mail went to another group, it is good to know for this group, too, per HTML5+RDFa at some point in the future... >> >> Ivan >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 17:22:44 UTC