W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:12:45 +0100
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, AlexMilowski <alex@milowski.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120516101245.14db17d6@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:58:03 +0200
Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> actually, under the current resolution, the triple will be
> 
> [] schema:url <http://www.example.org> .

OK, it is perhaps less bad than I previously thought.

But my point regarding [1] still stands.

____
1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/
2008Sep/thread.html#msg20

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:11:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:11:07 GMT