W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Test 0140

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:27:45 +0100
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120514222745.18de497a@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:00:01 -0400
Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:

> As you note, a BNode is a CURIE, and could be considered to be valid.
> Of course, the choice of output serializations will probably limit
> you here, as I'm not aware of any in which a BNode can be used in the
> predicate position, even N-Triples.

Notation-3 allows bnodes as predicates.

Toby A Inkster
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 21:25:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 May 2012 21:25:59 GMT