W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Test 0212 versus XML EC14N

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:52:29 +0200
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EA1C7E9A-9556-413B-AB3C-7449B41DE038@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
There are significant changes under way in RDFa 1.1 on this. Essentially, on the RDF lexical value side, the requirement of C14N will be gone, any well formed XML fragment is fine (and the equality of RDF Literals will be pushed down to the value space of the literal). Of course, RDF 1.1 is not a standard yet, but we can be pretty sure that this part of RDF will change.


On May 14, 2012, at 12:45 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> RDFa 1.0 specifies that XML literals use XML exclusive
> canonicalisation. Test case 0011 used to test for this.
> Test case 0212 seems to require non-exclusive C14N to
> be able to pass. If the rules have changed in RDFa 1.1
> (the spec has somewhat contradictory language about XML
> C14N), then that's fine, but test case 0212 should be
> dropped from the RDFa 1.0 suite, as it completely
> contradicts test case 0011.
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 10:49:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:56 UTC