W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Test 0140

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:36:15 +0100
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120514113615.68e62d44@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
Is there a spec reference for this?

Seems to me that:


conforms to CURIE syntax. Obviously blank nodes are not allowed as
predicates in any current version of RDF. However it is a syntactically
valid CURIE, so arguably should be treated the same as any other CURIE -
there will be no expansion for the "_" prefix, so it's treated as an
absolute URI, equivalent to the following token in Turtle:


Unless there's a spec reference I'd suggest either dropping this test
case, or changing the SPARQL to:

	  <$TCPATH/0140.xhtml> ?p "Test".
	  FILTER { isBlank(?p) }

Until I see a spec ref or the test is dropped/altered, it's going on
my "wilful violations" list.

Toby A Inkster
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 10:34:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:56 UTC