W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [editorial] RDFa Lite 1.1 needs to say what RDF and RDFa are

From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 00:42:44 -0400
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1336020164.29916.84.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 00:09 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Hi Liam,
[...]

> I have made 3 of the 4 changes you requested. We will have an official
> response back to you after the telecon tomorrow. If you are happy with
> these changes, please respond stating that as soon as you can. If you
> don't like the changes, please be specific about why you are not happy
> with them.

I'm fine with the changes, thank you.

I'd still prefer at least an informative reference to RDF but I
understand your reasoning and I'm OK with you not adding one.

Thank you responding!

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 04:46:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2012 04:46:56 GMT