W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Updates to RDF Interfaces, RDF API, and RDFa API

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:11:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4FE47D11.1060007@webr3.org>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> On 22 June 2012 05:13, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>> On 06/21/2012 10:23 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>>> I think this is a bit too negative.
>>> I agree that it is too negative.
>> It's been re-worded:
>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/NOTE-rdfa-api-20120628/
>>> If possible, I would like to see the issues detailed or liked to from
>>> this document.
>> Unfortunately, we don't have a full list - the list exists in the
>> collective memory of the group. Some of the list exists in group members
>> heads that have since left the group. When we migrate the documents to a
>> new group, we'll enter all of the issues in that issue tracker and
>> update the spec at that point.
>>> ...and, please let me know how I can help with this document. That's
>>> a volunteer statement. :)
>> We're going to try to transition the documents to a community group.
>> Please join that community group and help us work out the kinks with the
>> document. We'll definitely let you know when that group launches (within
>> the next couple of weeks).
> We'd be very happy to take this on, in the Read Write Web Community Group.
> [1]
> We have a reasonably active group of about 50+ people working on
> applications and standards to try and create the vision of the read write
> web, as described in "Weaving the Web", and "Design Issues".
> This document (along with Linked Data Profiles) seems to be quite relevant
> to what we are trying to achieve.  If you're looking for a home I think
> we'd be happy to iron out any issues on the document, create
> implementations and apps using the API etc.  Just let me know if you think
> this would be helpful. :)
> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/rww/

That sounds great to me, and as a natural home for the specifications - 
I'd be happy to pick up and help progress the work on these specs and 
their natural progressions over there with almost immediate effect :)

Thus, +1 from me.


Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 14:12:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:57 UTC