- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:39:24 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Please, please, please do me a favour and drop 'my' figure. This is prior art from some four years ago and certainly only confuses people. /me over and out. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 25 Jan 2012, at 10:34, Ivan Herman wrote: > And yet another point... > > A while ago, when we were discussing the restructuring of the > processing steps with @property, I have come up with a complete > diagram (well, a series thereof) for the processing steps. > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/Processing > > I am not sure it is 100% correct, I am not sure it is 100% useful... > but I wonder whether this is something we want to use for something. > > Caveat: I made a mess and I lost the original source for this (I > guess it was either keynote or powerpoint) so I would have to > reproduce it if we decided to use this. But that can be done, of > course. > > Ivan > > > On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:18 , Ivan Herman wrote: > >> Taking a somewhat more general view. >> >> The figure is an updated figure we had in the 1.0 rec, and landed >> in this document through a comment of Michael Hausenblas. But this >> was _before_ the radical change on the behaviour of @property. I >> wonder whether keeping it in the document is actually o.k.: it >> gives the mistaken impression that this is _the only_ behavioural >> view of @property which is way off base these days. Ie, we may be >> better off removing the figure altogether. >> >> Ivan >> >> >> >> >> On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:01 , Ivan Herman wrote: >> >>> So, an interesting situation... There are two comments on the >>> figure on @property->literal evaluation: >>> >>> >>> - Niklas says: >>> >>> The image with caption "Literal object resolution" is too big, >>> causing scrollbars to appear. >>> >>> - Manu says: >>> >>> The image is too small to make out what it says. >>> >>> The two comments cancel each other out... I am not sure what I >>> should do, if anything. >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 10:39:55 UTC