W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:42:20 -0600
Message-ID: <4F392F5C.8060209@aptest.com>
To: RDF Web Applications Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
My immediate reaction to this is "ummm... no?"  We can't reverse this 
order.  It would mean that if there is EVER an @vocab then terms don't 
work.  Why would we want terms to not work?  Or am I missing something?

On 2/13/2012 2:24 AM, RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker 
wrote:
> ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/129
>
> Raised by: Niklas Lindström
> On product: 3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core
>
> The essence of the proposal change the rules in 7.4.3 to:
>
> [[[
> * If there is a local default vocabulary, the IRI is obtained by
> concatenating that value and the term.
> * Otherwise, check if the term matches an item in the list of local
> term mappings. First compare against the list case-sensitively, and if
> there is no match then compare case-insensitively. If there is a
> match, use the associated IRI.
> * Otherwise, the term has no associated IRI and must be ignored.
> ]]]
>
> See related mails
>
>

-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
+1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 15:42:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:19 GMT