- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:34:12 -0500
- To: Adam Powell <adam@adaminfinitum.com>
- CC: "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Adam, thanks for the suggestion. What your asking for seems to be more related to vocabulary design than RDFa in particular. You might look at Good Relations[1], particularly their notion of Location[2], which seems like it might relate to the "areas serviced" spec you suggest. I don't know if GR discusses the notion of areas serviced beyond specifying the location of the service or business itself. Schema.org also has the notion of Place [3], which is used for many other types, such as LocalBusiness[4]. The best place to discuss vocabulary-related use cases and requirements is public-vocabs@w3.org. Gregg [1] http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/ [2] http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.html#Location [3] http://schema.org/Place [4] http://schema.org/LocalBusiness On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Adam Powell wrote: > Hi, > > I have been reading up on the semantic web lately. Today specifically on schema.org and then on your last call draft. I saw something on schema about Geo shape I think it was and I think that might work for my purpose but I wanted to contribute my idea anyway. > > I think a valuable addition would be a "areas serviced" specification. Lots of small businesses target specific areas and to be able to specify visibly or otherwise would be a wonderful addition. > > Keep up the good work, myself and the world appreciate it! > > Thanks, > Adam Powell > Adam Infinitum - Web Design, SEO, and more.. > Google+ > Twitter > Facebook > Newsletter Sign-Up (About pro photo business; I write about SEO, Marketing, Web Design, Social Media, etc.) > >
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 18:35:11 UTC