public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from December 2012 by author

Dan Brickley

• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (Friday, 7 December)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Sunday, 30 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 29 December)
• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Saturday, 29 December)
• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 28 December)
• HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (Friday, 28 December)
• Updated earl source (Thursday, 27 December)
• Re: Related to: Re: (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: Related to: Re: (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: ISSUE-145 (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: [rdfa-website] datatype rdf:XMLLiteral not properly handled (#16) (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Weighing the ideas around itemref (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Another possible problem? Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Role Attribute and RDFa Processor Implementations (Friday, 7 December)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Monday, 31 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Sunday, 30 December)
• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Saturday, 29 December)
• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Saturday, 29 December)
• Re: ISSUE-146 (HTML5 head/body): HTML5+RDFa needs rule for implied @about="" on head/body [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Wednesday, 26 December)
• Related to: Re: (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Fwd: Publication Request for HTML+RDFa 1.1 Working Draft (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: ISSUE-145 (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Fwd: [rdfa-website] datatype rdf:XMLLiteral not properly handled (#16) (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 10 December)
• Fwd: RDFa Lite API (JavaScript) (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Weighing the ideas around itemref (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Sunday, 9 December)
• Re: Another possible problem? Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Another possible problem? Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Fwd: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: Role Attribute and RDFa Processor Implementations (Friday, 7 December)
• Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (Friday, 7 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 3 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Sunday, 2 December)

Jochen Rau

• Re: [rdfa-website] datatype rdf:XMLLiteral not properly handled (#16) (Wednesday, 12 December)

Manu Sporny

• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Saturday, 29 December)
• Re: Preserving markup when distilling @property values in xhtml (Saturday, 22 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Wednesday, 12 December)
• More data on ISSUE-144 (Wednesday, 5 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 3 December)
• Telecon Agenda - December 6th 2012, 1500 UTC (Sunday, 2 December)
• New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Sunday, 2 December)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: ISSUE-145 (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: Weighing the ideas around itemref (Monday, 10 December)
• Weighing the ideas around itemref (Monday, 10 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Sunday, 9 December)
• Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Sunday, 9 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)
• Re: Reproducing Gregg/Niklas' thoughts (@itemref issue) (ISSUE-144) (Saturday, 8 December)

RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 28 December)
• ISSUE-146 (HTML5 head/body): HTML5+RDFa needs rule for implied @about="" on head/body [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Wednesday, 26 December)
• ISSUE-145 (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)

Sebastian Heath

• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Saturday, 29 December)
• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 28 December)
• "RDFa 1.1 in HTML5" default to generating XMLLiteral for content that contains elements (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: Preserving markup when distilling @property values in xhtml (Saturday, 22 December)
• Preserving markup when distilling @property values in xhtml (Thursday, 20 December)

Shane McCarron

• Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 28 December)
• Re: ISSUE-146 (HTML5 head/body): HTML5+RDFa needs rule for implied @about="" on head/body [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 27 December)
• Re: Related to: Re: (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 14 December)
• Re: Related to: Re: (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Re: ISSUE-145 (@content override @value): Should @content override @value? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 13 December)
• Role Attribute and RDFa Processor Implementations (Friday, 7 December)

Stéphane Corlosquet

• Re: [rdfa-website] datatype rdf:XMLLiteral not properly handled (#16) (Wednesday, 12 December)
• Re: Weighing the ideas around itemref (Monday, 10 December)

Last message date: Monday, 31 December 2012 05:32:15 UTC