W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: ISSUE-146 (HTML5 head/body): HTML5+RDFa needs rule for implied @about="" on head/body [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:59:36 +0100
Message-Id: <E72BA0F5-E24E-4840-92B2-87944490FDC0@w3.org>
Cc: "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
To: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
+1. This is an oversight.

Ivan

---
Ivan Herman
Tel:+31 641044153
http://www.ivan-herman.net

(Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)



On 26 Dec 2012, at 18:45, "RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> ISSUE-146 (HTML5 head/body): HTML5+RDFa needs rule for implied @about="" on head/body [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/146
> 
> Raised by: Gregg Kellogg
> On product: RDFa 1.1 in HTML5
> 
> XHTML+RDFa has the following clauses for Step 5 and Step 6 to act as if there is an implied @about="" on head and body elements:
> 
> In section 7.5, processing step 5, if no IRI is provided by a resource attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or @src), then first check to see if the element is the head or body element. If it is, then act as if the new subject is set to the parent object.
> In section 7.5, processing step 6, if no IRI is provided by a resource attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or @src), then first check to see if the element is the head or body element. If it is, then act as if the new subject is set to the parent object.
> 
> These rules are missing from HTML5+RDFa; I presume that these are intended there as well, but were left out due to an oversight. Test 0066 tests for this, and would fail for HTML5/XHTML5 otherwise.
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2012 20:00:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:57 UTC