W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: New Editor's Draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:26:05 -0500
Message-Id: <F85EE24E-FDD2-49D6-A908-E7A0EB8B67DC@w3.org>
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>


Just  cursory look at the differences: didn't we decide that, if an element overrides an inherited curie prefix locally via a @prefix, a warning should be generated into the processor graph? That would also automatically include a warning if a prefix from the initial context is overwritten. I do not see that in the new draft.



Ivan Herman
Tel:+31 641044153

(Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)

On 2 Dec 2012, at 14:39, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> A new editor's draft for HTML+RDFa 1.1 has been published which
> incorporates all decisions made by the newly re-chartered RDFa WG to
> date. As of this moment, there are no plans to add any new features or
> remove existing features from HTML+RDFa 1.1. This document is probably
> the one that is going to go to Last Call, so please review it and try to
> find any issues or problems:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-in-html-20121202/
> You can view a diff of the changes here:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-in-html-20121202/diff-20120911.html
> -- manu
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power
> http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 20:26:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:57 UTC