- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:59:37 -0400
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Well, so much for that idea :(. We'll just have to live with more "fb" IRI schemes out there; too bad, as it doesn't actually provide any semantic value, but does muddy up the graph. Gregg On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote: >> On the down side, two-character prefixes could be considered valuable, but who else but FaceBook would be likely to use "fb" (FreeBase?). > > http://prefix.cc/fb > > Hm. Interesting ... > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel.: +353 91 495730 > WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i > > On 24 Aug 2012, at 20:48, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > >> I've seen data in the wild that uses the fb: prefix, but doesn't define it. fb: is used as part of the FaceBook API, along with ogp:. >> >> For example, see [1]: >> >> [[[ >> <meta property="fb:app_id" content="112328095453510" /> >> ]]] >> >> This is defined on the developers site: [2]. >> >> On the down side, two-character prefixes could be considered valuable, but who else but FaceBook would be likely to use "fb" (FreeBase?). >> >> The prefix should be assigned to http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml. >> >> Gregg >> >> [1] http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Operation_40 >> [2] https://developers.facebook.com/docs/insights/ >
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 20:00:21 UTC