W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:37:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNLRi0cnX4DUP-1=fRr4wS+ExsDGNp9ad61a5ASPtbcy=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>
>> So, should these tests be fixed or skipped?
>
> We still run RDFa 1.0 tests to determine processor validity. Many processors implement both RDFa 1.0 and 1.1, although that will be of decreasing value over time.
>
> If you look at the test suite, you'll see that you can set the version to either 1.0 or 1.1 (and 1.1 with vocabulary expansion). Doing so shows a different set of tests.
>
> For your purposes, you should just run those that are for rdfa1.1.

Yes, based on your previous e-mail, I've changed my use of the
manifest.json to just use the rdfa1.1 tests.  As such, these have
become a non-issue.

-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 00:38:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 28 April 2012 00:38:10 GMT