W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:42:01 -0400
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <95C077A9-02E4-4DFA-A1C3-4AFDCFB7EC3C@greggkellogg.net>
On Apr 26, 2012, at 4:55 AM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 18:28 , Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> 
>>> ---
>>> Gregg, you essentially proposed to remove @rel from the effect of @vocab in HTML5+RDFa. This is, in my view, really throwing the baby out with the bath water at this point. We know that there are genuine use case for the usage of @rel (beyond  RDFa Lite) and I cannot simply explain to any user why @vocab would become unusable for that. It would make @vocab much less usable.
>> 
>> Yes, this was sort of a "Thermo-Nuclear" option, that does go too far, but is in keeping with RDFa 1.1 Lite principles.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> To be clear: this options, or similar, would be valid for HTML5+RDFa and _not_ restricted to RDFa Lite, right?

Yes, this was a proposed change to HTML+RDFa 1.1

Gregg

> Ivan
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:41:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:20 GMT