On Apr 26, 2012, at 4:55 AM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2012, at 18:28 , Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> >>> --- >>> Gregg, you essentially proposed to remove @rel from the effect of @vocab in HTML5+RDFa. This is, in my view, really throwing the baby out with the bath water at this point. We know that there are genuine use case for the usage of @rel (beyond RDFa Lite) and I cannot simply explain to any user why @vocab would become unusable for that. It would make @vocab much less usable. >> >> Yes, this was sort of a "Thermo-Nuclear" option, that does go too far, but is in keeping with RDFa 1.1 Lite principles. >> > > > > To be clear: this options, or similar, would be valid for HTML5+RDFa and _not_ restricted to RDFa Lite, right? Yes, this was a proposed change to HTML+RDFa 1.1 Gregg > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:41:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:20 GMT