- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:26:26 -0400
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Hi Henri, As stated in the previous response to ISSUE-130, I had pinged you on #WHATWG IRC about this discussion earlier this month, promising you a formal response: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120405#l-964 Again, apologies in the tardiness of this e-mail. The RDF Web Apps Working Group discussed your reply to the official response to ISSUE-130 and ISSUE-132. The full text of the discussion can be seen here: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-04-05#Responses_to_Henri_Sivonen More below... On 03/15/2012 08:50 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Manu > Sporny<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> RESOLVED: The @src attribute is only allowed on elements defined by >> the Host Language. (non-substantive) >> >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-02-23#resolution_2 >> >> Expect this clarification in the next version of the HTML+RDFa >> specification. This is a non-substantive finding for RDFa Core >> 1.1, XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1. >> >> Feedback -------- >> >> Since this is an official Working Group response to your issue, we >> would appreciate it if you responded to this e-mail and let us know >> if the decision made by the group is acceptable to you as soon as >> possible. > > Thank you for the change. > > You may record me as "agree" with the decision for disposition of > comments purposes but I disagree on the change being > "non-substantive". Noted. We discussed your "substantive" claim in more detail to make sure that the group agreed on the changes that we had made being non-substantive to RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1. Specifically, I should have been more clear in my response. Here is part of the discussion (linked to above) that outlines why we believe the changes were non-substantive: """ Manu Sporny: He agrees with our changes to the spec text based on the resolution to ISSUE-132. He disagrees that it was not a substantive change. The Working Group disagrees with Henri that it was a substantive change to RDFa Core 1.1 and notes three things: 1) That RDFa Core does not talk about what the content model of other languages should be, that is up to the Host Language, 2) @src has always been an optional attribute and was placed into the RDFa 1.0 specification because it was targeted at XHTML1, once it was split out into Core, @src became an optional attribute for the Host Language to include if it deemed appropriate, and 3) a substantive change was made to HTML+RDFa to only allow @href and @src on elements where it was already allowed by HTML5. """ followed by this proposal and resolution: """ RESOLVED: Regarding ISSUE-130 and ISSUE-132, the Working Group agrees that substantive changes were made to the HTML+RDFa specification. Substantive changes were NOT made to the RDFa Core specification. """ Since this is an official follow-up to your response to an issue that you filed, we would appreciate it if you responded to this e-mail and let us know if the findings made by the group are acceptable to you as soon as possible. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 04:26:52 UTC