W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:14:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNK6pXZ6Y8vEPoHuqNS_6S645Lm+5UvYZEBfAG2LLVMuBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>
> I appreciate there's potentially an issue here, but hope there's some
> mechanism for dealing with it quickly so would-be adopters can move
> ahead with adopting...
>

One mechanism is to just leave everything alone.  I might have
preferred a different outcome but I can live with the status quo.

I think we could go around and around on this one and messing with
@rel values feels dangerous.

-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 22:15:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:20 GMT