W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:27:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FN+Mwnq=5dT+GxNCoLaYOhO4Wz=bgR9=zvxi6EMp4Ewv4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> Perhaps the way to address unwanted @rel terms expanding because of @vocab is simply to say that, for HTML+RDFa, @vocab is not used to turn terms into IRIs, and so anything that's not a defined term causes the @rel to be dropped.
>
> This only affects HTML+RDFa 1.1, so does not address a CR change to RDFa 1.1 Core.

Wouldn't that mean we'd have to specify changes to the sequence
algorithm in the HTML+RDFa 1.1. specification?  Right now, everything
is nicely separated and the HTML+RDFa 1.1. specification just sets up
an initial context.


-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 18:28:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:20 GMT