- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:59:01 -0700
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here. @resource behaves the same > way whether its element include a @typeof or not. the only difference is > that the new subject is typed. my point is that without @typeof you would > also get the same triple with the @href value a new subject: > > <http://www.w3.org/> dc:title "W3C's Home Page" > > Expressing triples with the @href as new subject is not an issue with the > current processing steps, you just have to nest your markup inside the a > element. > > But maybe I missed your point? Yes, true. The point was about getting something similar to the triple: <> <...homepage> <http://www.w3.org/> that you lose with you have both @property and @rel on the same link. With @typeof, the link target gains a type triple. It isn't the same graph but you are able to have the relationship of the document to the linked page via @rel and the "kind" of the link via @typeof generating an rdf:type predicate. So, the loss of the @property generating a homepage predicate isn't a big deal because it generates a different triple that can be used to gain similar information. In the end, it may justify the status quo. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 17:59:30 UTC