W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: RDFa 1.1 Issues raised by Google

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 02:22:34 -0400
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F4AF138A-6406-43D9-B21A-C7C2E366F612@greggkellogg.net>
On Oct 23, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:

> There is a fairly lengthy conversation going on in the public-vocabs
> mailing list about RDFa. Most notably, Google is submitting bugs via
> that mailing list:
> 
> RDFa Lite proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0093.html
> 
> RDFa Lite as W3C Note or W3C REC:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0111.html
> 
> @itemref issues:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0096.html
> 
> @property/@rel authoring issues:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0113.html

Note this conversation is moving to the HTML Data TF mailing list, where syntax issues really belong. Here are a couple of my posts:

HTML+RDFa specific @property rules:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-data-tf/2011Oct/0218.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-data-tf/2011Oct/0225.html

Gregg

> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Standardizing Payment Links - Why Online Tipping has Failed
> http://manu.sporny.org/2011/payment-links/
> 
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 06:23:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT