W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Editorial change in the RDFa Core: parameters in accessing the processor graph?

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:16:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4EA413B1.3000708@aptest.com>
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
I will make this change in the source.  While it might effect some 
implementations, it can't be that big of a deal.  Nice catch!

On 10/22/2011 10:32 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> A small detail:
>
> a while we changed the terminology from default graph to output graph. And that is fine. However, the current core document, in 7.6.1 says, for the arguments that can be used for the processor:
>
> [[[
> the software must allow the caller to specify if they would like to retrieve the output graph, the processor graph, or both graphs as a single, combined graph from the web service. The rdfagraph query parameter must be used to specify the value. The allowable values are default, processor or both values, in any order, separated by a comma character. If the graph preference is not specified, the output graph must be returned.
> ]]]
>
> shouldn't it be 'output, processor' instead of 'default, processor'?
>
> This is not only editorial, it may require a change in some of the implementations.
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
+1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Sunday, 23 October 2011 13:16:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT