- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:52:09 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Obviously, a serialization is much easier than parsing, but there are certain features that I have not made use of. I suppose I could if, for a property, all objects are URI references, for example. That again will have to wait I am afraid... Cheers Ivan P.S. And, of course, I am sure there are bugs. I did that yesterday and today... On Nov 24, 2011, at 17:40 , Gregg Kellogg wrote: > Ivan, this is great! I'm just revising my parser and serializers too. We have some changes to make for coercion, but otherwise, I think we're almost stable on the syntax front. > > Great to see another implementation! > > Gregg Kellogg > > Sent from my iPad > > On Nov 24, 2011, at 8:34 AM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> Just for your info: >> >> http://www.w3.org/QA/2011/11/rdfa_11_meets_json-ld_in_the_d.html >> >> The serializer still needs some work to display lists nicely. For the time being nothing is done there. I am afraid this will have to wait... >> >> Ivan >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 16:49:17 UTC