- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:45:46 -0400
- To: Mischa Tuffield <mischa.tuffield@garlik.com>
- CC: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 03/17/2011 09:07 AM, Mischa Tuffield wrote: > Was my previous email clear, Shane did that all make sense? Hi Mischa, Shane's been missing in action for the past several days, but I did get a chance to read over your comments. They do make sense, the group will need to discuss changes that may or may not need to be made based on your input. I know Shane has a very particular way that he wanted the document to read concerning IRIs and URI References and that he was careful to be consistent the last time we had this URI References vs. IRI discussion. As far as I can tell, your comments are editorial, and I'll enter them as a part of the 2nd Last Call comments. That is, please let us know as soon as you can whether or not you believe that you have non-editorial comments on the specification. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Payment Standards and Competition http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/02/28/payment-standards/
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:46:18 UTC