W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Naming issues...

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:11:48 +0100
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Thomas Steiner <tsteiner@google.com>
Message-Id: <16CCE16B-9944-4FD8-9123-7B862FFC648D@deri.org>
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>

>> Structured Data API

+1

> Structured Mark-up API™?

-0.1 ;)

Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 1 Jun 2011, at 13:59, Thomas Steiner wrote:

> +1 for this being a (1st world) issue. How about Structured Mark-up  
> API™?
>
> --Tom
>
> Thank God not sent from a BlackBerry, but from my iPhone
>
> On 01.06.2011, at 15:50, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Just musing... Discussing with some colleagues I was wondering  
>> whether the term 'RDF API' is really the good one, and whether we  
>> should not use some more general and not-necessarily-RDF name  
>> instead. After all, our idea is that the parser underneath should  
>> be able to get microdata or microformats into the triple store,  
>> too, but that also mean that the projection interface & friends are  
>> not RDF only. What about something like 'Structured Data API'?
>>
>> Just an idea...
>>
>> I.
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 13:12:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:52 UTC