- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:11:48 +0100
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Thomas Steiner <tsteiner@google.com>
>> Structured Data API +1 > Structured Mark-up API™? -0.1 ;) Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 1 Jun 2011, at 13:59, Thomas Steiner wrote: > +1 for this being a (1st world) issue. How about Structured Mark-up > API™? > > --Tom > > Thank God not sent from a BlackBerry, but from my iPhone > > On 01.06.2011, at 15:50, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> Just musing... Discussing with some colleagues I was wondering >> whether the term 'RDF API' is really the good one, and whether we >> should not use some more general and not-necessarily-RDF name >> instead. After all, our idea is that the parser underneath should >> be able to get microdata or microformats into the triple store, >> too, but that also mean that the projection interface & friends are >> not RDF only. What about something like 'Structured Data API'? >> >> Just an idea... >> >> I. >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 13:12:17 UTC