- From: Thomas Steiner <tsteiner@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:59:51 +0300
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
+1 for this being a (1st world) issue. How about Structured Mark-up API™? --Tom Thank God not sent from a BlackBerry, but from my iPhone On 01.06.2011, at 15:50, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Just musing... Discussing with some colleagues I was wondering whether the term 'RDF API' is really the good one, and whether we should not use some more general and not-necessarily-RDF name instead. After all, our idea is that the parser underneath should be able to get microdata or microformats into the triple store, too, but that also mean that the projection interface & friends are not RDF only. What about something like 'Structured Data API'? > > Just an idea... > > I. > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 13:00:36 UTC