W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:13:55 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6C1E23.2010201@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
On 02/28/11 13:07, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Just for my understanding: what this means is that what I said
> remains true at least for XHTML:
> 
> - the XHTML default profile does not (necessarily) include the
> content of the RDFa+XML default profile - in the case of XHTML, an
> implementation has to load both of them (conceptually) and has to
> reconcile the prefixes and terms.

Correct.

> The difference you seem to stress is that a particular host language
> has the possibility to declare that it does _not_ want to get the
> RDFa+XML default profile to be loaded prior to its own profile.

Yes.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce
http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 22:14:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:51 UTC