W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 06:40:13 +0000
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110209064013.62ba4b7d@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:34:54 +0000
Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> I was just suggesting that we changed the value space of @profile to
> be absolute-URI, because then regardless of whether somebody wrote 
> http://a.b.c/e or http://a.b.c/e#f or http://a.b.c/e#g in @profile,
> it would always be seen as http://a.b.c/e .

My suggestion:

	- consumers MUST support fragment identifiers in profile URIs
	  (by simply trimming them off); and
	- publishers MUST NOT publish documents referring to profile
	  URIs with fragment identifiers.

This gives future RDFa Working Groups an extension point: they can
assign meaning to a fragment ID on a profile.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 06:40:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:51 UTC