W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-84 (Cool URIs and HTTPRange-14): The W3C TAG has asked us to mention that the use of fragment identifiers can be problematic [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:06:24 +0100
Cc: RDFa Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F3435AE9-B17E-4A92-BC2F-A7E371C207DB@w3.org>
To: nathan@webr3.org

On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:59 , Nathan wrote:

> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> I would agree with this restriction. @profile values should indeed be absolute URI-s
>> ...
>> I would actually add the same restriction to @vocab.
> 
> Ack we can't, @vocab needs to consider fragments, such as:
> 
> <div vocab="http://example.org/foo#">
>   <p property="bar"> ..
> 

Isn't that an absolute URI? What I meant is that a @vocab="#me" would be a problem. I do not care, in this context, of a fragment in the URI...

Ivan


> in order to form
>   <http://example.org/foo#bar>
> 
> Apologies, I missed that earlier - still absolute-URI could apply to @profile though.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Nathan


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 11:05:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:51 UTC