W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Official response to your LC comment (recorded as ISSUE-69)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 15:36:33 +0100
Message-Id: <9592D8C1-F873-48D5-9F7F-8AF010DADA7B@w3.org>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Toby,

the RDFa WG discussed the issue recorded at[1] and discussed in [2]. The question was whether the default profile of RDFa 1.1 core should include prefixes for "xml" and "xmlns". As recorded in [3], the group decided to indeed add these two prefixes to the list of default prefixes. For the records, the following mappings will be defined:

xml   -> http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
xmlns -> http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/

as defined by the XML documents.

I hope this answers your Last Call comments and you are satisfied with the answer. For our records, we would appreciate if you could answer to this mail, so that we could close the issue.

Sincerely

In the name of the RDFa Working Group

Ivan Herman

[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/69
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Dec/0076.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-02-03#resolution_1



----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 14:36:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:51 UTC