W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: ISSUE-92: Should the RDF API support SPARQL?

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:40:17 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB04FE1.4050403@webr3.org>
To: RDF Web Applications Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> ISSUE-92: Should the RDF API support SPARQL?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/92

This issue can be split in 3:

1) Should the RDF API require support for remote sparql accessed via say 
http? (and provide convenience methods)

2) Should the RDF API require support for local sparql? (and provide 
convenience methods)

3) Should the RDF API consider interface usage by SPARQL 
implementations, such that a SPARQL implementation could easily be built 
on top of RDF API interface modules developed by third parties? (and 
ensure support for generalized triples)

(from previous discussions 1&2 were deemed to be out of scope, as in 
some other wg or a note could define these at some point as extensions 
to the API, and that 3 would be wise).

Best,

Nahan
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 15:41:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:51 UTC