- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:16:02 -0400
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- CC: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On 04/05/2011 04:15 AM, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: > Just because I mentioned already SVG and I > have another format using RDFa as well - how > to indicate the intended RDFa version in other > (XML) formats than XHTML? Typically, the @version value is specified in the host language specification. I would expect that generic XML+RDFa processors will check for a string containing the text "RDFa 1.1" in the @version attribute of the XML document. I say "containing" instead of "exactly XML+RDFa 1.1" because the RDFa processors tend to not care about the structural bits of a host language outside of the HTML family languages. That is, many RDFa processors can attempt a best-effort parse of an XML document that contains RDFa and generate many useful triples from such a parse. SVG is one example of such a format, ePub may be another. If you are creating a Host Language document, and you can add support for the @version attribute, and assuming that your language is called something like "Foo", your version attribute could specify a value like: version="Foo+RDFa 1.1" -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The PaySwarm Vocabulary http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/03/31/payswarm-vocab/
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 23:16:27 UTC