W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: RDFa discovery?

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:31:14 -0400
To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>
CC: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EA6991FE-E6BF-4DEC-8B8C-1A6C8CCDD8E6@kellogg-assoc.com>
The ongoing discussion on SWI [1] on the use of site maps and VoiD seems just as relevant for RDFa as any other RDF format.

Gregg Kellogg

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2011Apr/0003.html

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:14 AM, "Nathan" <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Just a quick question, how does one tell whether an document contains, 
> or does not contain, RDFa?
> 
> Let's suppose I have an archive of 10k documents, I'd like to extract 
> the RDFa on them, how can tell upfront that they contain RDFa, without 
> having to process them all?
> 
> a: I may have already asked this previously!
> 
> b: This may be irrelevant for non-SAX based parsers (supposing that the 
> bulk of the weight would be in syntax->DOM conversion, a step needed 
> before any "this is RDFa flag" could be detected).
> 
> Unsure whether this is even worth asking now..
> 
> Best,
> 
> Nathan
> 
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:34:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:51 UTC