Hi Manu, Only a minimal snipped response, thanks for your reply, I'm happy w/ all answers :) Manu Sporny wrote: > On 04/02/2011 07:51 PM, Nathan wrote: > It may be /the/ way that we want to look at RDF data in the > future.... with only reasoning applications caring about the > datatype/language/etc. > >> sequence<RDFTriple> getTriples(); > > -1 - If people want to deal w/ triples, they can use the RDF API. Which may not be implemented, and for which they may not have a parser (or it may well be more efficient to use the "in browser" implementation should such a thing be available. Together with the above datatype & lang issue, this is why I proposed the getTriples method, it means the API always provides at least /some/ way of getting to that data, and believe it's an easy hit to implement. However, I'm not going to push that strongly for it :) Best, NathanReceived on Sunday, 3 April 2011 17:57:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:09 GMT