- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:04:18 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 30.09.2010 18:46, Shane McCarron wrote: > Honestly, it almost never changes. But it's not like there is an RSS > feed that would tell you. Regardless, I think it is outside of our scope I was going to say that a Last-Modified header and/or an ETag header are just fine, but I just checked, and IANA's server doesn't appear to return them: http://redbot.org/?uri=http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html Hopefully they'll fix that once they get too many requests. > AND A BAD IDEA to try to define interesting sets of schemes so you can > identify that something is a URI or not within the context of a plain > literal. Its just a bad idea. Yes. > ... > The right thing to do is to get them to use <link rel='whatever' > href='URI'> instead of <meta>. @href, @src, and @resource take URIs and > that's what they should be doing. It isn't any more work for their > consumer base to do this instead of using meta. Every uses link for > stylesheets and other stuff already. Its fine. Its safe. > ... +1 > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 17:04:58 UTC