- From: Sebastian Heath <sebastian.heath@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:33:06 -0400
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Which is the right discussion list to respond on so that comments automatically make it into the "Related E-Mails" section of http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/120 ? public-html-comments@w3.org ? I promise to be nice but just want to get on the record as a hand creator of RDFa who isn't a computer scientist. No prefixes would really be a bummer for me and my community. I work with total non-techies who are not going to type full URIs. Thanks, Sebastian. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Just a heads-up. The editor of the HTML5 specification has escalated an > issue in the HTML WG that started out as a bug against RDFa in HTML. > This concerns the design decision to use prefixes in RDFa as well as the > concept of CURIEs: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/120 > > The entire bug history can be found here: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Saving Journalism - The PaySwarm Developer API > http://digitalbazaar.com/2010/09/12/payswarm-api/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2010 13:33:44 UTC