- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:38:53 +0100
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
How about:
"""
After processing, the following triples will be generated:
_:john foaf:mbox <mailto:john@example.org> .
_:sue foaf:mbox <mailto:sue@example.org> .
_:john foaf:knows _:sue .
The blank node identifiers ("_:john" and "_:sue") are arbitrary and
implementations are not required to maintain the same identifiers as
occur in the RDFa markup. The above data could have equivalently been
represented as:
_:a foaf:mbox <mailto:john@example.org> .
_:b foaf:mbox <mailto:sue@example.org> .
_:a foaf:knows _:b .
For clarity, this document retains blank node identifiers in examples,
but developers must not rely on RDFa implementations returning
identifiers that are consistent with the RDFa markup.
"""
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 20:39:35 UTC