- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:42:02 +0000
- To: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi All, Just been refreshing some docs and code, and realised that throughout the documentation we refer to a TypedLiterals datatype, but TypedLiteral has a .type - and further we've now introduced an RDFNode.getType() method, which makes it even more ambiguous. I'd propose that we: - swap TypedLiteral.type to TypedLiteral.datatype - swap RDFNode.getType() to RDFNode.interfaceName (an attribute) This should resolve all confusion and possible conflicts with other specifications/standards and common libraries, as .type and .nodeType are very common, likewise getType in java when using getters and setters. Best, Nathan
Received on Sunday, 28 November 2010 16:42:43 UTC