W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Feedback on RDFa Core 1.1

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 00:42:41 +0200
Message-Id: <1B7CEF12-60D4-4B41-AC8B-F7AE3F4CC726@danbri.org>
To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Cc: St├ęphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>




On 3 May 2010, at 00:07, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>  
wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> I'm not convinced the case is as clear-cut as you say. For example,
> when it comes to caching documents such as OWL files and RDFa
> profiles, then having a version number or date in the URL will greatly
> help.
>

Can you give an example of where this  has worked out well? Which urls?

cheers,

Dan
Received on Sunday, 2 May 2010 22:42:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:47 UTC