W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Feedback on RDFa Core 1.1

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 19:53:41 +0000
Message-ID: <i2g1452bf811005021253t7373af26p20d435b2cbf7c7f5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> Oh, I just noticed the "0.1" thing there. Dear RDFa WG, please do not
> encourage any more poor souls to put version info into their namespace
> URIs. Really!
>

http://twitter.com/SifuMoraga/status/8508702701


>
> > [[[
> >    '<span about="urn:ISBN:0091808189" typeof="biblio:book"
> > ]]]
> > how about using some common practice and capitalize RDF classes, e.g.
> > biblio:Book?
>
> Seconded. This might seem picky, but being able to do a first-cut
> parse of RDF simply by skimming for capital letters keeps a lot of
> people sane. Do please stick to those conventions...


It also helps checking RDFa markup sanity: finding non capitalized terms in
a typeof attribute is usually not good...

Steph
Received on Sunday, 2 May 2010 19:58:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:47 UTC