W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2010

Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:34:19 +0000
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <t2ydd0fbad1003302333k3b680430g416f6ccd6adf1935@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> I would suggest that this Working Group makes it a point to have the
> RDFa WG review the Microdata specification when it goes to LC.
> Similarly, this WG should make it a point to ensure that WHATWG reviews
> the RDFa Core 1.1, HTML+RDFa, and RDFa DOM API specification when it
> goes to LC.
> 
> I can't imagine that the reviews are going to be overflowing with
> praise, from either group, but it's the proper due diligence that should
> be expected from any W3C Working Group.

I can promise a review of the RDFa 1.1 spec.

~TJ



Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:58:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:06 GMT