W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2010

Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:48:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4BB26385.3040601@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 30.03.2010 22:17, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> ...
>> At the moment, it's not expected that RDFa WG/HTML WG would release
>> HTML+RDFa LC simultaneously with HTML5 LC. Coordination for simultaneous
>> release may be too difficult and is not necessary. So, the documents can
>> stay decoupled, which will hopefully help HTML5 progress without being
>> held up by RDFa.
>
> Is everyone ok with HTML+RDFa progressing on a separate schedule from
> HTML5, and a separate schedule from Microdata? I believe there is some
> interest in bringing Microdata to Last Call at the same time as HTML5.
> While I do not think it is essential that any of our specs go out at the
> same time, I wanted to check if anyone has a problem with the
> possibility that Microdata may go out before HTML+RDFa, if HTML+RDFa is
> blocked on the RDFa Core schedule.
> ...

I'd like to point again to Tim's message 
(<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0871.html>):

> It is important (a) that the design be modular; (b) that the specifications be kept modular and (c) that the communities of expertise of the respective fields (graphics and data) be involved in the design process.

Did we make any progress on (c)?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 20:48:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:06 GMT