W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2010

Re: New version of @profile and @vocab

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:51:20 -0400
Message-ID: <4BAC8398.3030907@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>


On 2010-3-26 05:33 , Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 15:55 -0400, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Having read the minutes of the 2010-03-25, I have committed a new
>> version of the document:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2010/ED-vocab-20100326/ 
> 
> A few editorial issues:
> 
> * In section 2 there is a property which seems to be inconsistently
> referred to as 'uri' and 'URI'. In the accompanying Turtle file, it's
> 'URI'. I'd suggest using 'uri' consistently, as RDF vocabularies tend to
> use lower case for properties.

Agreed.


> 
> * In the Turtle file you use owl:functionalProperty which should have a
> capital 'F'.

Ouch:-( Done

> 
> * In the Turtle file and the document, you assert that the domain of
> 'keyword' is 'PrefixMapping' - it should be 'KeywordMapping'.
> 

Ouch again:-(


> * In the Turtle file and the document, you use rdfs:PrefixMapping
> instead of rdfa:PrefixMapping.

and again:-(

> 
> And some non-editorial ones:
> 
> * Nothing is said about whether keyword and prefix mappings are
> case-sensitive or not. RDFa 1.0 keywords are case-insensitive.
> 

Good point! I have added a note accordingly to the processing part,
though that part will undergo further editing when merged with the RDFa
Core text. (I think we did have a discussion at some point on whether
the xmlns prefixes are case-insensitive, and we agreed they should, so
this is a clear consequence of that decision)

> * If rdfa:uri is an owl:FunctionalProperty it rules out this:
> 
> 	[
> 		a rdfa:KeywordMapping ;
> 		rdfa:keyword "name" ;
> 		rdfa:uri foaf:name ;
> 		rdfa:uri rdfs:label
> 	] .
> 
> I think it would be very nice for keywords to be expandable to multiple
> terms.

That I do not understand. Do you mean that the same keyword would
automatically generate several URI-s, ie, would generate several
triples? This is certainly not the way I envisaged that...

I did not make that change on the document for the last point which I
believe should be discussed further. I have incorporated all other
changes and updated the document (on the same URI this time, this is not
really a new version...)

Thanks a lot!

Ivan

> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf



Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 09:50:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:06 GMT